[arin-ppml] ARIN Board members

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jul 22, 2015, at 7:07 AM, David Huberman <David.Huberman at microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> In the current process, this interview/questionnaire is done by the nomcom.
>> Questions are proposed by the public, edited or consolidated as appropriate
>> by the nomcom, posed to candidates, and the responses are published to
>> the web site.
>> 
>> Can you elaborate on what you see as the significances of the differences
>> you’re proposing?
>> 
>> https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/elec_procedures.html#botcv
>> 
>> https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/candidate_bios.pdf
> 
> 
> You're right - my idea overlaps the current questionnaire too much.

I wasn’t criticizing your suggestion, I’m sure the current process can be improved (and this is a great time to do so, since we’re right at the beginning of the nomcom process for this year).  I just wanted to try to get the gist of what you felt needed to be prioritized.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150722/1329f90f/attachment.sig>