[arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please don't me make do ULA + NAT66)
Gary T. Giesen
ggiesen at giesen.me
Tue Feb 17 13:08:57 EST 2015
We're not talking 50 new routes. We're talking about an aggregate /40.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: February-17-15 1:06 PM
To: Gary T. Giesen
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please
don't me make do ULA + NAT66)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Gary T. Giesen <ggiesen at giesen.me> wrote:
> I don't necessarily disagree. Just trying to minimize the business
> risk of having to have virtually all of my customers qualify under e)
> with the risk of rejection because my use case isn't specifically spelled
When your use case is within an inch or two the one we'd like to prevent, 50
new routes in the table, each serving 10 people on average, business risk
kinda goes with the territory.
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us Owner,
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML