[arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please don't me make do ULA + NAT66)

[David Huberman]

Thank you John!

So Gary: I understand your meta point. I am all for clarity and ease-of-use in the NRPM.  As an AC member, I hope to drive the NRPM to more and more “easiness”.

But (and perhaps I’m wrong), I feel that EU v6 policy is pretty needs-free and easy.  You have 5 clauses to qualify under, and clause e) really is the ‘catch-all” bucket for “everything else”, including the case you brought up.

Disagree?

David R Huberman
Microsoft Corporation
Principal, Global IP Addressing

From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at arin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:09 AM
To: David Huberman
Cc: Gary T. Giesen; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 End-User Initial Assignment Policy (or: Please don't me make do ULA + NAT66)

On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:54 AM, David Huberman <David.Huberman at microsoft.com<mailto:David.Huberman at microsoft.com>> wrote:

But “something quite so fuzzy” is your interpretation, not ARIN’s.   So let’s get ARIN’s interpretation and try and take the fuzziness out of the equation.

Question for ARIN:  In the general (normal) case when an application is made for EU v6 under clause e) and there’s a technical explanation for why they want RIR-issued space, will the application be approved ?

Yes, so long as a technical explanation is provided.   NRPM 6.5.8.1 provides a
list of several situations that would warrant direct end-user IPv6 assignment,
and others are accepted as well so long as a reasonable technical justification
is provided.

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150217/5223e0d0/attachment.htm>