[arin-ppml] An interesting policy question

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Thu Dec 3 11:08:13 EST 2015

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
> Thanks for quick reply, and sorry about my English ability.Below is what my
> understanding to the reply:
> Example 1:
> No, there is no need to notify ARIN simply because change of location.(
> provided other fact stay the same)
> Example 2.
> In case of 3 location shrinking to 2 location, there is also no need to
> notify ARIN provided the service stay the same.(in-out region does not
> relevant here as the number of location is decreased, so even  there is an
> out region location was notified ARIN during application process in the
> first place)
> Correct me if I might be mistaken.


That's generally correct.

One caveat: Internet Service Providers and SWIP. Folks with ISP
allocations (not end-user assignments) are expected to maintain
accurate SWIP records with ARIN. To the extent that location was
reported in the original SWIP records, it would need to be updated.
>From what I understand, internal infrastructure generally doesn't get
reported with any location details. SWIP is intended mostly to report
customer assignments.

Bill Herrin

William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list