[arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Aug 21 11:14:24 EDT 2015
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Rob Seastrom <rs-lists at seastrom.com> wrote:
>> 8.1.x Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
>> IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the
>> requesting organization must attest) that they will use at least 50% of
>> their aggregate IPv4 addresses (including the requested resources) on an
>> operational network within 24 months.
> Still against it because it still applies to out-region transfers
> where ARIN no longer has access to it and CAN NOT revoke it for fraud
> when the attestation turns out to be untrue.
Actually, it does not apply to the recipients of out-of-region transfers. NRPM 8.4 states that "The conditions on a recipient outside of the ARIN region will be defined by the policies of the receiving RIR."
This proposed language would only apply to 8.3 and 8.4 transfer recipients in the ARIN region.
More information about the ARIN-PPML