[arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7

khatfield at socllc.net khatfield at socllc.net
Thu Aug 20 18:57:09 EDT 2015

I agree with David here. I do believe there should be a requirement that any new allocations must keep the allocation x amount of time before it can transferred. Possibly 12 months+ which would thereby kill most ideas to sell for profit.


> On Aug 20, 2015, at 4:05 PM, David Huberman <David.Huberman at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> > Still against it because it still applies to out-region transfers where ARIN no
> > longer has access to it and CAN NOT revoke it for fraud when the attestation
> > turns out to be untrue.
> So I get what you're saying.  And you're right.  You and I petition ARIN, attest
> that we forecast to use a /X, we're lying, and we transfer it out of the region and
> ARIN is done with it - ARIN has no control over the block transferred out.
> The disagreement I have with this view is that I don't want us making policy that
> punishes the 99.9% of people who are telling the truth and just want to run their
> network, so that we can somehow "catch" the 0.01% of the scammers.  I prefer
> making policy which works well for bona fide network operators.  People will always
> lie, and I do not believe it’s ARIN’s job to catch that.
> Thanks!
> David
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150820/e711048f/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list