[arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7
mike at iptrading.com
Fri Aug 21 12:45:19 EDT 2015
I support the proposal.
Sent from my Sprint phone
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> </div><div>Date:08/21/2015 11:14 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> </div><div>Cc: "arin-ppml at arin.net" <ppml at arin.net> </div><div>Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Thoughts on 2015-7 </div><div>
> On Aug 20, 2015, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Rob Seastrom <rs-lists at seastrom.com> wrote:
>> 8.1.x Simplified requirements for demonstrated need for IPv4 transfers
>> IPv4 transfer recipients must demonstrate (and an officer of the
>> requesting organization must attest) that they will use at least 50% of
>> their aggregate IPv4 addresses (including the requested resources) on an
>> operational network within 24 months.
> Still against it because it still applies to out-region transfers
> where ARIN no longer has access to it and CAN NOT revoke it for fraud
> when the attestation turns out to be untrue.
Actually, it does not apply to the recipients of out-of-region transfers. NRPM 8.4 states that "The conditions on a recipient outside of the ARIN region will be defined by the policies of the receiving RIR."
This proposed language would only apply to 8.3 and 8.4 transfer recipients in the ARIN region.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML