[arin-ppml] Automatic IPv6 Eligibility

[Owen DeLong]

+1.

Well said, Andrew.

Owen

> On Aug 14, 2015, at 11:25 , Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
> 
> I don't think we want to have a policy where we give out an ipv6 /48 per ipv4 /24.  I'm all for giving people the space they need, but v6 is a different mindset than v4.   A /48 per site has generally been the goal of most ipv6 policies.
> 
> Andrew
> 
> On 8/11/2015 3:05 PM, Alfie Cleveland wrote:
>> John -
>> 
>> Apologies if I wasn’t entirely clear. As referenced in Section 9.3.1. of the APNIC INPP, I propose that this also applies to end users - allowing end users to, free of charge, receive a /48 for each /24 they hold.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alfie
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11 Aug 2015, at 23:01, John Curran < <mailto:jcurran at arin.net>jcurran at arin.net <mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Alfie Cleveland < <mailto:alfeh at me.com>alfeh at me.com <mailto:alfeh at me.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I’m requesting comment in regards to automatically make organisations eligible for IPv6 if they hold justified IPv4 space. This similar to  Section 9.3.1. of the [APNIC-127] APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies. I feel that if organisations were able to receive a /48 for each /24 they hold, then it would help expedite the rollout of IPv6. Organisations currently have two choices - continue to use IPv4, or spend valuable time on applying for IPv6 space. IPv6 space is clearly in abundance - and this could potentially help slow the exhaustion of IPv4.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Alfie -
>>> 
>>> Per NRPM 6.5.2.2, an ISP qualifies for an IPv6 allocation if they have a previously justified IPv4 ISP 
>>> allocation from ARIN (or one of its predecessor registries), or can qualify for an IPv4 ISP allocation 
>>> under current criteria; i.e.  this means that they presently are automatically eligible for IPv6 if they 
>>> hold IPv4 space, as you suggest above.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps you are proposing that there be a default automatic size of IPv6 allocation ("a /48 for each
>>> /24 they hold”) which would allow for more expeditious preparation of IPv6 initial requests, for those 
>>> who choose to receive this default allocation size rather than calculating the "smallest nibble-boundary 
>>> aligned block that can provide an equally sized nibble-boundary aligned block to each of the requesters 
>>> serving sites large enough to satisfy the needs of the requesters largest single serving site using no 
>>> more than 75% of the available addresses”?  
>>> 
>>> /John
>>> 
>>> John Curran
>>> President and CEO
>>> ARIN
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20150814/56cedb3c/attachment.htm>