[arin-ppml] Smalest ISP v6 Allocation
arin at ics-il.net
Fri Aug 14 06:19:07 EDT 2015
If the smallest IPv6 allocation an ISP can get is a /36 (X-small or up to /20 in IPv4), but we have a fee established for XX-small (up to /40 IPv6 and /22 IPv4), why don't we permit an ISP to get a /40? Small providers may not want to increase their ARIN fees to simply be able to get their own IPv6 allocation. Seems counter-intuitive in getting everyone on the IPv6 train. It also falls on a clean boundary, so there shouldn't be any concerns with issued subnets.
If there's no good reason why we're not doing this, how to we start the process to allow this?
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML