[arin-ppml] Micro-allocation policy proposal draft

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 08:03:23 EDT 2014

Question for ARIN:

Is whether Micro Allocation v4 address space sparsely allocated or not
a policy or administrative question?



On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> On 9/22/14, 10:56 AM, Andrew Dul wrote:
>> At the Chicago meeting there was some discussion around the
>> micro-allocation policy (section 4.4) of the NRPM.  I committed to the
>> AC to produce a draft update to this section based upon feedback that I
>> heard from the community.  Below you will find a draft update.
> As someone who just completed a 4.4 request I didn't feel there was anything
> broken about existing policy that warrants fixing.
> The only thing I'd support is removal of the fees statement, which I agree
> is no-op language. However, you do not address 6.10, which has similar
> language. If you're going to change 4.4 you also need to address 6.10.
> ~Seth
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list