[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: SimplifyingMinimumAllocations and Assignments
bcornett at servlet.com
Thu Sep 4 14:09:09 EDT 2014
I would not support an automatic entitlement.
There is no question that the process can seem daunting, but it is a
minimal barrier to entry in my mind.
And I apologize for not paying more attention to the discussion.
On 09/04/2014 01:53 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Bruce Cornett <bcornett at servlet.com> wrote:
>> For what it is worth, I think this is a good policy for the smaller guys.
>> I have two clients that desperately want their own allocation. One runs a WISP with a /24 and the other high security cloud stack with a /22.
>> Both need to double immediately. And I hate parting with the address space. They cannot meet the /20 criteria and giving them addresses from our space limits our business model - because granting that won't push us to the point where we can request more. And dual homing them doesn't do anything for my business.
> In about two weeks, they will be able to qualify at the /24 level, and the /20 criteria completely goes away based on policy which has already been adopted and is pending implementation.
> Given that, do you still see a need for this proposal?
More information about the ARIN-PPML