[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18: Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments
JOHN at egh.com
Wed Sep 3 14:52:49 EDT 2014
I agree with Seth. Oppose ARIN-2014-18.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
> > On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
> > Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
> > Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_18.html
> > You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft
> > Policy 2014-18 on the Public Policy Mailing List.
> > The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance
> > of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource
> > Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are:
> > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> > * Technically Sound
> > * Supported by the Community
> > The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
> > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
> > Regards,
> > Communications and Member Services
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> > ## * ##
> > Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18
> > Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments
> I completely oppose this policy.
> If an org of any size it too lazy or ineffective to bother with planning
> to justify a /24 then they can get a /29 or whatever from an ISP that
> doesn't need justification. They don't need IP space from ARIN.
> Justifying a /24 is a very low bar. Either do it or go home.
Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
781-861-0670 ext 539
More information about the ARIN-PPML