[arin-ppml] Multi-homing justification removed?
Mike Burns
mike at iptrading.com
Thu Nov 20 13:43:05 EST 2014
Still, in the age of exhaustion the
building case against needs testing "should" also remove multi-homing
as a requirement to acquire your own address block so that you do not
have to constantly renumber or be captive. -Martin Hannigan
I personally would be more amenable to considering a policy change to
liberalize the requirements for getting a /24 if/when they're available from
the transfer market only.-Scott
Hi Martin and Scott,
Just to present the reminder that 2014-14 would answer here, as it would
provide the ability for entities in the sorts of situations being discussed
to purchase up to a /16 without a needs test on the transfer market.
2014-14 presents a relief valve for ARIN members facing this issue, and many
other known and unforeseeable issues.
Transitioning to a paid market for addresses can only be expected to create
turbulent conditions.
It would be nice for members to know they have a outlet for exigent
circumstances built into policy.
Regards,
Mike
.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list