[arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal

Peter Bui petertbui0 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 12:34:40 EDT 2014


I support



Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 25, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I support this.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
>> I would support this.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Steven Ryerse
>> 
>> President
>> 
>> 100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
>> 
>> www.eclipse-networks.com
>> 
>> 770.656.1460 - Cell
>> 
>> 770.399.9099- Office
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> <image001.jpg>℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
>> 
>>         Conquering Complex Networks℠
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Azinger, Marla
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:06 PM
>> To: arin-ppml at arin.net; arin-discuss at arin.net
>> Subject: [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Having been on the AC for a 6 years I support a term limit for the AC.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> When on my 4th year I pursued creating a term limit.  At the time I was told this was an action the BOT would have to take.  No action was taken.  Later I inquired on this being submitted as policy since the BOT did not take action.  I was told it would be thrown out since it’s not a matter of policy.  Now with time and reviewing other public posts, I have more hope this will be taken seriously and something done.  I include this small history on my experience to show that the idea of term measures has been around for a  while but for some reason never gained traction.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I believe a balance between familiarity, hitting a productive stride, burn out and mind melting needs to be balanced out with fresh able minds.  I also believe a solid 3 year break is needed for people to re-integrate as a non-AC person and regroup.  Leaving anyone on a committee for more than 6 years opens the door to stagnation, burn out, and conformity of thinking.  Remember, just because someone is not on the AC any longer does not mean AC folks can’t get advice from them if desired.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I propose the following be used for AC:
>> 
>> -Keep the 3 year terms in place  and add
>> 
>> -a 6 year contiguous term limit
>> 
>> -a 3 year ineligibility year period after a term ends be it 3year or 6years
>> 
>> -After 3 year ineligibility is over a person my run for a position on the AC again.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I believe the BOT should also have some term measures and limits.  However, I am asking someone who has served on the BOT in the past to create a thought out term plan and propose it.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> To keep this topic on track, I have purposely excluded the discussion of committee member candidate requirements.  This should be a separate topic that also needs discussion in order to better ensure community wide representation.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Marla Azinger
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140325/138d29d8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list