[arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal
Marla.Azinger at FTR.com
Tue Mar 25 12:32:24 EDT 2014
This has nothing to do with trust. I look at the facts. History proves that just voting fails. And the downfall occurs before voting even happens.
-People are less likely to run for a position on the AC knowing they are up against long time incumbents
-People are less likely to run for a position on the AC knowing stagnation exists and new thought is not likely to be received well
-Familiarity is comfort and subconsciously people lean toward this. True opportunity for change must be present and not just a perception.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:15 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:05:47PM +0000, Azinger, Marla wrote:
> I believe a balance between familiarity, hitting a productive stride,
> burn out and mind melting needs to be balanced out with fresh able
> minds. I also believe a solid 3 year break is needed for people to
> re-integrate as a non-AC person and regroup. Leaving anyone on a
> committee for more than 6 years opens the door to stagnation, burn
> out, and conformity of thinking.
So, why make a rule about this instead of trusting the voting members (and the people sitting) to get it right?
That is, I agree with everything you say, but I don't understand why the solution to that is to make an absolute rule that can never be violated in exceptional cases. What problem are you trying to solve?
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML