[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-7: Section 4.4 Micro Allocation Conservation Update - Revised

Bill Darte billdarte at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 15:32:19 EDT 2014

Oh, BTW....I don't have any problem with increasing from 2 to 3, but am
against it for more....and, I may be willing to carve out an exception for
Caribbean communities still encumbered by limited competition.  There, have
a public exchange already in existence may support future competition.  I'd
be very interested to hear from our colleagues in that sub-region.


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>wrote:

> > On Mar 10, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Michael Peddemors <michael at linuxmagic.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 14-03-10 09:05 AM, David Huberman wrote:
> >> Michael Peddemors wrote:
> >>
> >>> >While on the surface this might seem prudent, it may be onerous for
> smaller players.
> >>> >More information might be needed to determine adverse cases, or
> possibly some
> >>> >exemption for rural players that might not be able to attain a 3rd
> participant.
> >> Is a public exchange point really a public exchange point if there are
> only 2 participants? Isn't that just private peering for the time during
> which no one else participates? I'm not seeing the public good, justifying
> the draw down of a /24 from the public free pool, for two participants.
> >
> > Understood, however the smaller regional players might want to get this
> in place for the future, when possibly additional peers may come available.
> >
> > Just playing the devil's advocate, but that is the only reason I can see
> for not increasing it to three or more..
> Any reason two small rural players shouldn't start with a PA /30 and
> renumber into a larger block if/when they get a third participant?
> Unless someone has a good argument for why that's an excessive burden,
> support changing 2 to 3.
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140310/42f9c112/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list