[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-7: Section 4.4 Micro Allocation Conservation Update - Revised
David.Huberman at microsoft.com
Mon Mar 10 12:05:03 EDT 2014
Michael Peddemors wrote:
> While on the surface this might seem prudent, it may be onerous for smaller players.
> More information might be needed to determine adverse cases, or possibly some
> exemption for rural players that might not be able to attain a 3rd participant.
Is a public exchange point really a public exchange point if there are only 2 participants? Isn't that just private peering for the time during which no one else participates? I'm not seeing the public good, justifying the draw down of a /24 from the public free pool, for two participants.
More information about the ARIN-PPML