[arin-ppml] ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improved 8.4 Anti-Flip Language

Matthew Petach mpetach at netflight.com
Sun Mar 9 14:46:14 EDT 2014


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Bill Darte <billdarte at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb. 21 I sent the message (far below) to PPML asking the community to
> support one of 3 alternatives or propose new language which makes one or
> the other better, or a completely new wording which they believe
> accomplishes the goal of producing policy language that is needed,
> technically sound and improves existing policy in the 8.4 Inter-RIR
> transfer realm.
>
>  [...]
>


> 3. Take an alternative tack and simply restrict transfers on a per-block
> rather than a per-organization basis. e.g. 'No block acquired within the
> past 24 months would be eligible for transfer.' (The time frame is of
> course an arbitrary number at this point.)
>
>

I support option #3.

I'm curious if it would be better to reference time
periods from other sections of the NRPM, rather
than hard-coding a specific term here?  IE, if we
limit transfer requests to a 24-month supply, then
tie the anti-transfer period to be the same duration
as the supply length, so that if we extend or contract
the supply length for transfers, this anti-flip language
inherits the same change.   This doesn't affect my
support for option #3, I'm just looking to see if there's
ways we can limit the potential for the NRPM getting
'out of sync' with itself in the future, if we change one
section but don't catch all the related sections like this.

Thanks!

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140309/0ed28cbf/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list