[arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal

[Owen DeLong]

Speaking only for myself as one of the often more controversial members of the AC, I will say that I have been pleasantly surprised
each time I have been re-elected. While I do vote for myself when applicable, I only have the ability to cast 3 votes as I am the DMR for
three organizations, all ISPs, two of which are pretty small. As such, I think it is pretty hard to make the case for self-perpetuation.

The number resources I hold do not have voting rights as I have chosen not to pay an additional $500 for that privilege. Personally, I think it is a travesty that non-ISP resource holders do not get voting rights without paying an additional fee. I have brought this up many times, but it hasn’t gone anywhere.

At the risk of sounding self-serving, I oppose term limits for the same reasons already articulated by Paul.

Owen

On Mar 25, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Paul Timmins <ptimmins at clearrate.com> wrote:
> I have concerns that forcing people out of a position where people repeatedly vote for them is undemocratic,
> 
> Paul,
> 
> It would be interesting to tally the votes available to the respective bodies (all ORG-IDs). I wonder if there is some high level of self perpetuation that term limits might not actual be useful to mitigate and provide for a pro-democratic result?
> 
> Best,
> 
> -M<
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140325/3354a8ed/attachment.htm>