[arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal

[Azinger, Marla]

This has nothing to do with trust.  I look at the facts.  History proves that just voting fails.  And the downfall occurs before voting even happens.

-People are less likely to run for a position on the AC knowing they are up against long time incumbents
-People are less likely to run for a position on the AC knowing stagnation exists and new thought is not likely to be received well
-Familiarity is comfort and subconsciously people lean toward this.  True opportunity for change must be present and not just a perception.

Regards
Marla


-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:15 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:05:47PM +0000, Azinger, Marla wrote:
> 
> I believe a balance between familiarity, hitting a productive stride, 
> burn out and mind melting needs to be balanced out with fresh able 
> minds.  I also believe a solid 3 year break is needed for people to 
> re-integrate as a non-AC person and regroup.  Leaving anyone on a 
> committee for more than 6 years opens the door to stagnation, burn 
> out, and conformity of thinking.

So, why make a rule about this instead of trusting the voting members (and the people sitting) to get it right?

That is, I agree with everything you say, but I don't understand why the solution to that is to make an absolute rule that can never be violated in exceptional cases.  What problem are you trying to solve?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.