[arin-ppml] Unintended Consequence of 2014-17
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net
Thu Jun 26 16:32:06 EDT 2014
-17 makes needs testing more fair for smaller organizations. In terms
of larger organizations, it isn't at all practical to have a /8 and
spend even a minute of your day to request something much, much
smaller. That would be like me requesting a /24 right now. I would
never do that :)
I get the sense that some of the community feels I have an ulterior
motive for supporting this proposal given my concurrent support of
something similar to -14.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, <lar at mwtcorp.net> wrote:
> I must strongly oppose 2014-17
> It effectively removes meaningful needs testing for large and very large
> (I know that utilization isn't the only test but it's a major part of need
> According to my admittedly hasty and crude calculations:
> If you have in aggregate a /8 of IPv4 and you have 90% of it utilized.
> -You could-
> request a /16
> and before you used a single one of those addresses meet the need
> requirement for another /16 and still
> be over 80% utilization.
> Other sizes scale accordingly but the effect is the same greatly favoring
> the large and very large.
> Larry Ash
> Network Administrator
> Mountain West Telephone
> 123 W 1st St.
> Casper, WY 82601
> Office 307 233-8387
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP
Fellow, Black Lotus Communications
mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: blacklotus.net
More information about the ARIN-PPML