[arin-ppml] Policy discussion - Method of calculatingutilization ARIN-2014-17

[Jeffrey Lyon]

Owen,

I would be extremely grateful if you would be kind enough to take
charge of introducing the removal of needs testing for /20 and longer
as a policy proposal.

Please keep in mind we're still talking about this on the ARIN-2014-17
thread which is a different proposal :)

Thanks, Jeff

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> .....
>> Actually, I believe that this circumstance is the reason that the immediate
>> needs clause
>> exists.
>
> "Immediate need" occurred to me, too, but as the
> NRPM can be a bit "dense" to parse, I had not had
> time to review if it properly applies.  I am glad someone
> has more time (and experience) to parse the NRPM.
>
> .....
>
>> If people support the idea above, I'm happy to put it into a policy template
>> and get it started in the process. If there is strong support, it can
>> probably be moved through the process fairly quickly.
>
> The devil is in the details, but this does, indeed,
> sound like the correct change to resolve what
> appears to one of those practical issues in real
> work networks that I support.
>
> Gary
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.



-- 
Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP
Fellow, Black Lotus Communications
mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: blacklotus.net