[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17: Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate - revised
matthew at matthew.at
Mon Jul 14 15:34:28 EDT 2014
On 7/14/2014 12:21 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman"
> <David.Huberman at microsoft.com <mailto:David.Huberman at microsoft.com>>
> > So I don't get something:
> > If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of many XL
> networks, almost all of whom would be immediately eligible for more
> space even though they weren't eligible previously?
> > I feel like in missing something.
> No, I think you have it. The issue this proposal tries to fix for
> some smaller networks has the (I presume) unintended side effect of
> letting $megaisp$ acquire additional numbers immediately. Perhaps
> some contorted language could "fix" that without other side effects,
> but the edges get complicated.
Deck chairs, Titanic.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML