[arin-ppml] 4.4 Micro Allocations and IXP requirements

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 10 14:52:37 EST 2014

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Aaron <aaron at wholesaleinternet.net> wrote:

> On 1/10/2014 12:58 PM, David Farmer wrote:
>> Fees aren't a policy issue, we could recommend to the board that IPv6
>> micro-allocations to IXPs that already have resources be free.  But it
>> should not be written into a policy statement.
> We had to cough up $2500 for ours if I remember correctly (v6 allocation)
> because end users pay full freight.  For us, a small exchange that is
> supported by member contributions and donations, it was a big deal.  In the
> end, HE paid for it but if they hadn't we might have forgone v6 for awhile.

Is there better language around the org type? That's steep for a non


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140110/ad681c91/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list