[arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy InternetResource Holders
hannigan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 13 12:07:14 EST 2014
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:58 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 9:18 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
[ clip ]
> > However, to be honest, I'm not that interested in playing the ancient
> history game -- I find the whole exercise pointless and boring. I am,
> however, interested in what policy changes you believe it will take to get
> ARIN to accurately reflect reality in its registry database. What's it
> going to take?
> I have been attempting to follow up on your suggestion to poll the
> community, but we seem to have reached an impasse because ARIN is
> keeping the registry accurate and your formulation would suggest
> otherwise. Hence, my attempt at a more balanced phrasing, i.e. that
> we should "survey the ARIN community regarding the prioritization of
> needs-based transfers vs operational usefulness of registry data."
> If we can come up with acceptable language, we'll figure out how to
> poll the ARIN community on this topic.
How about polling resource holders instead? A much larger audience.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML