[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-7: Section 4.4 Micro Allocation Conservation Update

Heather Schiller heather.skanks at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 12:13:06 EST 2014


I oppose the policy as written.

I don't have an opinion on the 2 vs 3, though I see it as such a small
change and given the total number of CI IX assignments (66 over how many
years?) it won't significantly change anything.

I am opposed to the policy because of this line " IXP's formed as non
profits will be considered end user organizations. All others will be
considered ISPs."

 This statement will impact the overwhelming majority of Critical
Infrastructure assignment holders, the majority of which are not IX's.  The
goal of attempting  preservation should be done by how the allocation is
justified, not how much the entity is billed.   111 of the CI allocations
are not to IX's.  Of the 66 IX allocations it is nearly split between end
users and ISP's.





On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>  I oppose the change. Anyone inclined to abuse a two participant standard
>> can easily create or obtain a 3rd participant for said purpose. This is
>> literally a case of change for the sake of change. No, a 3 participant
>> minimum is not an unreasonable standard. However, since it does have some
>> negative impact and is utterly unlikely to be at all effective in deterring
>> abuse, I see no benefit to the change.
>>
>
> I agree with Owen on all points and oppose the policy change.  Most
> importantly, this policy change significantly raises the bar for a
> legitimate IXP to get started while doing nothing effective to prevent what
> is, effectively, a tiny amount of potential abuse.
>
> --
> Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:
>  BrandonNRoss
> +1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:
>  2269442
>                                                          Skype:
>  brandonross
> Schedule a meeting:  http://www.doodle.com/bross
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140211/230c6cbd/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list