[arin-ppml] support for 2014-1 (out of region use)
cb.list6 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 10 09:21:24 EST 2014
On Feb 9, 2014 8:05 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> On 2/8/2014 6:19 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> If we want to manage addresses this way, we should first endeavor to
pass a globally coordinated policy to the effect that multiregional
organizations should solicit the registry in their headquarters' region for
all registry-direct number resources rather than soliciting the registry
that serves the region where the resources are employed.
> I have a better idea:
> For IPv4, realize that really really soon, this isn't going to matter.
> For IPv6, realize that it almost never matters.
> I have no problem with someone getting a nice big IPv6 block from one
convenient local RIR, and then splitting it up across their multinational
organization however they see fit. If they plan well, they *never* come
back to *any* RIR for address space.
> Meanwhile, why are we still discussing IPv4 policy at all?
> Matthew Kaufman
100% agree with Matthew on both points.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML