[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML 2014-7
mysidia at gmail.com
Fri Feb 7 20:13:00 EST 2014
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:18 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
Agreed. Also agree that IXPs with only a handful of participants are a
very easy low-cost renumbering scenario.
Why should the bar be as low as two or 3 participants?
Why not make the required number at least 9 or 10 participants minimum,
with actual documentation for 4 or 5, before a whole /24 is warranted?
It's not abuse I'm worried about. Abusers will coax the documentation
> to say what ARIN expects to hear. And if busted for fraud they'll get
> what's coming to them. My issue is with the unrecoverable addresses
> when the perfectly honest "IXP" fails to grow from two participants.
> Bill Herrin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML