[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-7: Section 4.4 Micro Allocation Conservation Update
John Springer
springer at inlandnet.com
Tue Feb 11 12:25:59 EST 2014
Opposed as written.
Agree with the following reasoning. I am OK with the 2 -> 3 change.
John Springer
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Heather Schiller wrote:
> I oppose the policy as written.
> I don't have an opinion on the 2 vs 3, though I see it as such a small change and given the total number of CI IX assignments (66 over
> how many years?) it won't significantly change anything.
>
> I am opposed to the policy because of this line " IXP's formed as non profits will be considered end user organizations. All others will
> be considered ISPs."
>
> This statement will impact the overwhelming majority of Critical Infrastructure assignment holders, the majority of which are not IX's.
> The goal of attempting preservation should be done by how the allocation is justified, not how much the entity is billed. 111 of the
> CI allocations are not to IX's. Of the 66 IX allocations it is nearly split between end users and ISP's.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I oppose the change. Anyone inclined to abuse a two participant standard can easily create or obtain a 3rd
> participant for said purpose. This is literally a case of change for the sake of change. No, a 3 participant
> minimum is not an unreasonable standard. However, since it does have some negative impact and is utterly
> unlikely to be at all effective in deterring abuse, I see no benefit to the change.
>
>
> I agree with Owen on all points and oppose the policy change. Most importantly, this policy change significantly raises the bar
> for a legitimate IXP to get started while doing nothing effective to prevent what is, effectively, a tiny amount of potential
> abuse.
>
> --
> Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
> +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
> Skype: brandonross
> Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list