[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML 2014-7

[Rudolph Daniel]

I do not support the change from 2 to 3 for end user ixp s.
See my earlier remarks.
Does ARIN have good evidence of abuse of the current situation?

Rudi Daniel
(information technologist)
784 430 9235
On Feb 6, 2014 1:07 PM, <arin-ppml-request at arin.net> wrote:

> Ok.William...thanks for that...was not too sure.
>
> RD
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:34 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > In the small Caribbean states, although there seems to be
>> > policy to implement IXP s, many are still not getting the buy
>> > in from existing ISP s ...so it is possible that an IXP could
>> > get off the ground with 2 and once up and running, others
>> > will join in.
>>
>> Hi Rudi,
>>
>> There aren't many use cases in which renumbering is genuinely trivial.
>> Three nodes in a BGP exchange is one of them.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill Herrin
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
>> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Rudi Daniel
>
> *danielcharles consulting
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>*
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140206/5bda9c61/attachment.htm>