[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML 2014-7
rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 15:35:31 EST 2014
I do not support the change from 2 to 3 for end user ixp s.
See my earlier remarks.
Does ARIN have good evidence of abuse of the current situation?
784 430 9235
On Feb 6, 2014 1:07 PM, <arin-ppml-request at arin.net> wrote:
> Ok.William...thanks for that...was not too sure.
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:34 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel at gmail.com>
>> > In the small Caribbean states, although there seems to be
>> > policy to implement IXP s, many are still not getting the buy
>> > in from existing ISP s ...so it is possible that an IXP could
>> > get off the ground with 2 and once up and running, others
>> > will join in.
>> Hi Rudi,
>> There aren't many use cases in which renumbering is genuinely trivial.
>> Three nodes in a BGP exchange is one of them.
>> Bill Herrin
>> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
>> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
>> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> Rudi Daniel
> *danielcharles consulting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML