[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-21: Modification to CI Pool Size per Section 4.4
hannigan at gmail.com
Mon Dec 29 16:41:51 EST 2014
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:17 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> Back to the main ARIN-2014-21 thread.
> On 12/26/14, 13:29 , Martin Hannigan wrote:
> I checked. You're right. You can't find the discussions. I'll ask the
>> web team to make sure mailing list archives are easily findable on the
>> website. Mea culpa, that's an oversight. We're growing rapidly and
>> missed that unintentionally. In the meantime, this should work
>> Hope that was helpful. Questions offline or --> over there at OIX.
>> Martin Hannigan (marty at open-ix.org <mailto:marty at open-ix.org>)
>> Open-IX Association/Treasurer
> Thank you for proving the pointer to the OIX archives. I have review the
> discussion related to this policy and personally found it helpful and
Most of the worlds leading interconnection experts reside on that mailing
> However, as John Curran stated "the tabulation of messages in support and
> opposition will reflect solely the PPML discussion counts", therefore; so I
> currently see 2 clear statements of support, no opposition, a proposal to
> modify the policy text, primarily consisting of editorial changes for the
> broader section 4.
Curran is inaccurate from my viewpoint. That's the unilateral approach that
probably doesn't work for ARIN as a whole. I don't see any of the limits he
mentions codified e.g. the NANOG PPCs aren't codified in the PDP.
Miltons thoughts on the subject are spot on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML