[arin-ppml] 2014-14, was Internet Fairness
bill at herrin.us
Wed Dec 24 12:24:35 EST 2014
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:00 AM, John Santos <JOHN at egh.com> wrote:
> Oppose 2014-14
> 1) /16 is not "small"
This is the main problem I have with 2014-14. Start with /24's or
maybe /22's and keep track of what happens to them. Then use the
knowledge gained to formulate a better policy when expanding the
process to larger blocks.
I think it also needs a limit on the number of untested transfers in
which an organization can participate in a given time period.
The text itself needs some cleanup to deal with the more obvious
unintended consequences, but the /16 boundary is what kills it for me.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> Then make it /18 to align with the fee schedule definition of "small".
I ran a regional ISP on two /18's. You're not getting the concept of "small."
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
May I solve your unusual networking challenges?
More information about the ARIN-PPML