[arin-ppml] 2014-14, was Internet Fairness
rcarpen at network1.net
Wed Dec 24 12:05:33 EST 2014
I also oppose. John Santos sums up the big points with which I agree:
----- On Dec 24, 2014, at 1:00 AM, John Santos JOHN at egh.com wrote:
> Oppose 2014-14
> 1) /16 is not "small"
Agreed. Even by ARIN definition it is "medium" :-)
> 2) The problem the proposal purports to solve hasn't actually been
> demonstrated. "ARIN staff [...] is spending scarce staff time on needs
> testing of small transfers." Obviously, doing the necessary checking
> requires staff time, but is it a significant amount? Is it taking much
> longer than it used to? Is it costing ARIN a lot of money in staff
> wages and overhead to do these assessments, or is it lost in the noise?
I have not heard or seen any data to support the "ARIN staff is too burdened" argument, other than there being a slightly longer processing time for IPv4 requests, which I am completely fine with. IPv6 requests have been pretty speedy for me.
More information about the ARIN-PPML