[arin-ppml] Internet Fairness
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Sun Dec 21 15:00:02 EST 2014
I definitely prefer removing needs testing in a reasonable way. If that can't be achieved and so far this Community seems to be against it, then lets force everyone to live by the policies for both new and renewal allocations. I think that would have the effect of this Community making changes to the policy to improve them and it might also have the effect of unneeded resources being returned for other to obtain.
Steven L Ryerse
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099 - Office
770.392-0076 - Fax
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 3:47 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Internet Fairness
On 12/19/14, 17:05, Mike Burns wrote:
> And in this discussion there was suprising accord between Steven and
> Owen relating to the proposal to impose annual needs testing on all
> resource holders. I would suggest that the trading market imposes the
> most effective ongoing needs-test of all.
I see continuous auditing as hurting small orgs the most. Large orgs have staff dedicated to that kind of stuff with no burden to them. Also, a small org could have a large customer cancel in bad timing causing them to fail an audit whereas a large org's churn differential has less impact to their numbers.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML