[arin-ppml] Internet Fairness
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Thu Dec 18 12:27:20 EST 2014
Maybe a majority of the vocal community does, but I doubt if you add in all members of the community who do not comment and all the members of the community that only hold legacy allocations, I suspect that might not be the case. I think the legacy community is speaking volumes by not participating by commenting in this forum.
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: Gary Buhrmaster [mailto:gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:12 PM
To: Steven Ryerse
Cc: Owen DeLong; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Internet Fairness
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
> All of those stats are interesting but they are not what is important here. What is important is how many small Orgs that applied for the minimum allocation (as it was defined at the time of the allocation request) since ARIN was chartered were denied because of needs policy.
> I don’t know what that number is but if it is greater than zero, it shouldn’t have happened! ARIN’s Mission is to Advance the Internet, not to stifle it.
While there is clearly support by some for your position advocating needless number allocations, the majority of the community supports a review to insure that the allocations are actually advancing the Internet, and not just throwing numbers around to whomever asks, whatever their plans (or lack thereof).
More information about the ARIN-PPML