[arin-ppml] RPKI Relying Agreement

Adam Thompson athompso at athompso.net
Thu Dec 4 10:36:45 EST 2014

On 14-12-04 09:31 AM, Andrew Gallo wrote:
> (cross posted from NANOG)
> Greetings:
> In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a 
> number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI 
> Relying Agreement.  Acceptance of this agreement is required in order 
> to gain access to ARIN's Trust Anchor Locator (TAL).
> Given the size and number of these organizations that can't or wont 
> accept the agreement makes me wonder if this is a show stopper that 
> will prevent the adoption of this technology.
> I've created a quick survey to get an idea of the community's take on 
> this agreement with the idea that if enough organizations indicate it 
> is unacceptable, maybe we can get this agreement changed, or as with 
> other regions, not explicitly required to use the TAL.
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10RLBBpL05n1c_H4unHitlsVqNM3rZI5aXAX8iSBc_Kk/viewform?usp=send_form 

You seem to have left out one question in the survey: "even if you have 
signed the agreement, did you think it was ridiculous, legalistic, 
overbearing and paternalistic, anyway?"

-Adam Thompson
  athompso at athompso.net
  Cell: +1 204 291-7950
  Fax: +1 204 489-6515

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list