[arin-ppml] RPKI Relying Agreement
Adam Thompson
athompso at athompso.net
Thu Dec 4 10:36:45 EST 2014
On 14-12-04 09:31 AM, Andrew Gallo wrote:
> (cross posted from NANOG)
>
> Greetings:
>
> In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
> number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI
> Relying Agreement. Acceptance of this agreement is required in order
> to gain access to ARIN's Trust Anchor Locator (TAL).
>
> Given the size and number of these organizations that can't or wont
> accept the agreement makes me wonder if this is a show stopper that
> will prevent the adoption of this technology.
>
> I've created a quick survey to get an idea of the community's take on
> this agreement with the idea that if enough organizations indicate it
> is unacceptable, maybe we can get this agreement changed, or as with
> other regions, not explicitly required to use the TAL.
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10RLBBpL05n1c_H4unHitlsVqNM3rZI5aXAX8iSBc_Kk/viewform?usp=send_form
>
You seem to have left out one question in the survey: "even if you have
signed the agreement, did you think it was ridiculous, legalistic,
overbearing and paternalistic, anyway?"
--
-Adam Thompson
athompso at athompso.net
Cell: +1 204 291-7950
Fax: +1 204 489-6515
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list