[arin-ppml] Ip allocation

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Apr 28 20:38:14 EDT 2014


On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:20 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com<mailto:hannigan at gmail.com>> wrote:

Should the board step in?

By the time this gets turned from beef to chicken in the "process" and then brought forward it will have already caused more damage than ever before.

Support.

Best,

-M<

On Monday, April 28, 2014, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com<mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>> wrote:
I agree it is past time to do this as it is ARIN's reason to exist to allocate.

Given the clear problem statement, it shouldn't be hard to make a policy proposal that
very quickly results in clear policy text for the change.   Combine that with evidence of
solid community support and dwindling IPv4 free pool, and it would be feasible to ask
for Board intervention, if needed.  Note that even under our standard timelines, this
could be adopted immediately after the ARIN Public Policy Consultation at NANOG 61
if recommended beforehand and well supported at that meeting.

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140429/967a7097/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list