[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN 2014-2 Improving Anti-Flip Language

xiaofan yang nikiyangxf at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 21:46:56 EDT 2014


Hi Bill,

Thanks for your update and summary.

My answer is to tick option 1 with answer of NO. As ARIN still has the free
pool, there is no need to further discuss this proposal.  I would like to
suggest to abandon this draft.

Regards,

Niki






On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Bill Darte <billdarte at gmail.com> wrote:

> The Draft Policy ARIN 2014-2 Improving Anti-Flip Language was discussed at
> the ARIN 33 Public Policy Meeting in Chicago last week and while there was
> no consensus for the Draft using current language, the community encouraged
> the AC to continue work on it as there was sympathy for the problem
> statement. https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_2.html
>
> Draft Policy Issue:
> Simply, the author wishes the Anti-Flip language currently used in the
> NRPM to be relaxed, allowing an Inter-RIR transfer within their own
> organization of previously existing addresses....though they may have
> received a new allocation or assignment within the last 12 months.
>
> Current draft language states that the organization may do such a
> transfer, but may not use the actual addresses which were received from
> ARIN (or through transfer) in the previous 12 months.  But they could
> therefore transfer other resources holdings.
>
> Request for feedback:
> In order to further this discussion and gain a consensus, I would like to
> once again ask the community to speak in favor or against this Draft Policy
> so that it may be presented and discussed at our next Public Policy
> Consultation at NANOG in June.
>
> 1. Yes or No.  Should the community relax existing policy which attempts
> to limit the transfer of ARIN resources out of region, in order to allow an
> organization flexibility to move address blocks to another portion of their
> own organization in another region, even though they might have received
> different addresses within ARIN in the last 12 months?
>
> (Note current policy would still restrict availability of new addresses to
> the organization for a period of 12 months after the transfer and is not
> being changed by this draft).
>
> 2.  If YES above, are there any other qualifications or limits that should
> be imposed on the resources transferred or the organization?
>
> (Note that a vote of NO to question #1 would essentially ask the Advisory
> Council to abandon this draft policy leaving existing policy in place.)
>
> Thanks to all who continue to work within the community to exercise their
> right and duty to craft appropriate policy guiding ARIN's important role in
> Internet number resource management.
>
> Bill Darte
> Policy Shepherd for 2014-2
> ARIN Advisory Council
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140421/5220301b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list