[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9 Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

Jay Martin jaymartin926 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 22:25:43 EDT 2014

Hi Azinger,

My standpoint to this proposal is neutral.   Someone inside ARIN told that
AOL has done  the 8.2 transfer recently.  The so-called conflict and
utilisation rate test is just some bureau language left there without
preventing this transfer.

ARIN is so nice to talk and assist on the 8.2 transfer request and has
paved out the way for AOL's next 8.3 transfer to anyone interested in
purchase.  There is no real issues to be resolved by this 2014-9 Proposal.
 I suggest to withdraw this proposal.

Furthermore, the good news is that  there are many ZERO utilisation blocks
for Sale now.  Is there anyone interested to join me to form a consortium
to buy some IPv4?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Azinger, Marla <Marla.Azinger at ftr.com>wrote:

>  YES support.  This policy never should have existed.
> As someone who has personally handled 5 different network purchases and
> integration of those networks, this policy is problematic. The process of
> integration requires more address space than what is ever currently in use
> with a purchase. If you are lucky there is more address space than
> currently in use so that you can easily conduct integration requirements
> like a lab, upgrades, rolls and more.
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140416/6a8ad7a4/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list