[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8
jaymartin926 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 22:41:04 EDT 2014
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:55:48 -0500
From: Kevin Kargel <kkargel at polartel.com>
To: "arin-ppml at arin.net" <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8
<8695009A81378E48879980039EEDAD28013645561D at MAIL1.polartel.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Agreed. ARIN should be a registry and as such absolutely should be
non-competitive and blind to the market. The registry should not be
configured to support the market. IMHO ARIN should not be participating in
or catering to the market in any form.
From: David Huberman
[mailto:David.Huberman at microsoft.com<David.Huberman at microsoft.com>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:31 AM
To: Kevin Kargel; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8
ARIN is a registry, not a regulator. The more you guys want to
build in rules that are anti-competitive and blind to the market
reality, the more inaccurate Whois gets.
you must witness so many inaccurate whois info during those 11 years
working as the Hm in ARIN. It will be better for you to tell the truth or
to justify your above claim through solid information otherwise this
becomes lack of persuasion.
Upon v4 exhaustion, we should remove needs basis from
transfers, remove the RSA text that makes the signer disclaim
property rights, and motivate registrants to keep Whois accurate
so that network operators can get good information about their
Why do you think remove needs test will be enhance a more accurate whois?
if removed it will be easier for microsoft to buy more IPv4?
Why do you think having a property right will bring out a more accurate
because your employer has bought too many and spend quite a lot and you
want a policy to protect its benefits?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML