[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-9: Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements

xiaofan yang nikiyangxf at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 01:00:15 EDT 2014


Hi John,

Thanks for your reply.  So if we do not want to return the address, we can
have them transferred for sale?
and ARIN will not treat our 8.2 transfer as the disguise of  8.3 transfer
 if 8.3 transfer come next after the 8.2 transfer?

Niki


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:50 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

>  On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:34 PM, xiaofan yang <nikiyangxf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  *Hi John, *
>
>  *We would like to do a 8.2transfer because of our restructure. *
> *However,  the transferred ips are underutilized.  based on your comments
> in the list, it seems that if those ips are lack of utilisation, ARIN will
> ask us to return those ips or  ARIN will not approve our transfer ?*
>
>  *I have asked ARIN HM to explain and Shawn said if we can provide the
> appropriate documents,  no matter if those ips are lack of utilisation,
> Arin will approve the transfer and furthermore, we are free to transfer
> those ips to others in basis of 8.3 transfer.   I am quite confused here.
> it seems that John' comment conflicts with Arin HM's comments.   Which one
> should my company follow?    ...*
> Regards,
> Niki
>
>
>  Niki -
>
>  ARIN will seek that you return the additional address space or transfer
> it to another party
> (via NRPM 8.3/NRPM 8.4) as part of the approval of your NRPM 8.2
> restructure transfer.
>
>  This is effectively what ARIN Hostmaster indicated to you, and what I
> attempted to convey
> (perhaps unsuccessfully) in my earlier comments.
>
>  Thanks!
> /John
>
>  John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140402/ce2f028d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list