[arin-ppml] 2600::/12 LOA
hannigan at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 22:23:06 EDT 2014
It's a no op then. There's no need to mention LOA's at all.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014, Heather Schiller <heather.skanks at gmail.com>
> The suggested text restricting LOA is: "ARIN will not issue a Letter of
> Authority (LOA) to route a research prefix unless the allocation is
> properly registered in whois."
> The text does not specifically restrict ARIN from issuing an LOA
> altogether, it requires that the resource be registered in whois. I think
> the text allows them to issue LOA for research where necessary and
> legitimate. It should not impede them from issuing LOA in any other
> circumstance (though, outside of research, I don't imagine they get many
> requests for LOA) Can you foresee a circumstance where it would be
> appropriate for ARIN to issue an LOA for something *not* registered in
> whois? Do you think the current text impedes them from issuing necessary
> and legitimate LOA's?
> > wrote:
>> >>>> NRPM 11 was designed for parties requesting allocations from ARIN for
>> >>>> research purposes; not ARIN checking the quality/integrity of new
>> >>>> received from IANA. Given the recent occurance, I believe it is
>> >>>> for ARIN to utilize NRPM 11 going forward for purposes of this
>> >>>> checking, as it makes visible the organization doing the
>> >>>> use of the space, including duration of the activity and research
>> >>>> as well as reaffirming the expected uniqueness requirement.
>> >>> If I understand this correctly, Matthew suggested that an update to
>> >>> Section 11 would be more useful? If that's the case I agree. It would
>> >>> require a few, simple, modifications.
>> >> I think his suggestion to make use of NRPM 11 for this purpose is quite
>> >> excellent. It was not process that we used in the past, but shall be
>> >> done that way going forward. To the extent that the community wishes
>> >> to improve NRPM 11 policy text for this purpose of address space
>> >> that is also welcome.
>> >>> Why would ARIN ever need to issue an LOA if whatever is distributed is
>> >>> in the registry? All the LOA responsibilities if even needed at that
>> >>> point would fall to the registrant.
>> >> Agreed; that is the major benefit of taking an "NRPM 11" approach to
>> >> space testing - ARIN stays focused on being a registry and leaves the
>> use of
>> >> address space to registrants. Since registrants are unique for a
>> given address
>> >> block, we also preempt multiple parties with potentially conflict
>> plans on the
>> >> use (or routing) of any given portion of address space.
>> > Yes, I agree. This is the preferable route.
>> > Best,
>> > -M<
>> To add to this, it appears that we can condense most of the hand
>> waving down to a modification in Section 11.4 that adds to the end of
>> the paragraph "All resource assignments will be registered in the ARIN
>> WHOIS database and in a manner not conflicting with any other
>> registrations". Or any other language that would accomplish the same
>> We ought not to specifically restrict ARIN from writing an LOA. There
>> may be a circumstance where it is necessary and fully legitimate.
>> Admittedly, the instances where it would be needed would be corner
>> cases, but operators in the AP region, for example, are very strict
>> and I've had some strange reasons for writing LOA for my own prefixes.
>> It may also interfere with the encumbrance testing that John
>> mentioned. I suspect there are also some other tricky authority
>> This sounds like a legitimate error to me so this should be enough to
>> instill a codified message that we want registrations and self
>> service. Anything else needs more attention.
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML