[arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal

Sweeting, John john.sweeting at twcable.com
Tue Apr 1 16:04:06 EDT 2014


Jesse

Not sure who else you are referring to but Chris is not a sitting AC member.

Thanks
John

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:48 AM, "Jesse Geddis" <jesse at la-broadband.com<mailto:jesse at la-broadband.com>> wrote:

Rotflol conspiracy theories abound. Completely ignoring the fact that the two folks to broached the topic are sitting AC members...

Facts for thought...

The policy changes I want to push I submit. Note the previous fee discussion, modelling, and resultant proposal. I can't speak for anyone else but that's my current priority and has nothing to do with the AC. I've made no secret, however, about slow start and initial allocation policies for ISP's being problematic. But haven't yet proposed a change.

Jesse Geddis
LA Broadband LLC

On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com<mailto:cgrundemann at gmail.com>> wrote:




On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Paul Timmins <ptimmins at clearrate.com<mailto:ptimmins at clearrate.com>> wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net<mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net> [arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net<mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net>] on behalf of Martin Hannigan [hannigan at gmail.com<mailto:hannigan at gmail.com>]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:02 PM
> To: William Herrin
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml at arin.net>; arin-discuss at arin.net<mailto:arin-discuss at arin.net>>
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal
>
> > I would NOT support this for the board. ARIN benefits from the board's
> > continuity.
>
> If you really want change, term limit the Board and forget the AC.

Do people really WANT change though? I think part of what helps the community at large is the predictability of policy w/r/t number allocation.

A neutral entity controlling allocation uniformly per a generally stable policy provides a good regulatory environment for everyone, I'd think.

+1

NRPM stability is a good thing for both network operators and Internet users.

Also, needed change seems to happen in the current frame work and I see no indication that "more" change is a good thing without looking at the specific changes. Which of course leads to the question: Perhaps some of those advocating for term limits actually seek a very specific change, or set of changes, that they believe they could achieve by taking over the AC after booting out those who have repeatedly shown that they will support the entire community rather than be bowled over by special interests? Hmmm...

Food for thought,
~Chris



-Paul
_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.



--
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com
_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20140401/7ebbe928/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list