[arin-ppml] Subject: ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improved 8.4 Anti-Flip Language
kkargel at polartel.com
Tue Apr 1 11:31:12 EDT 2014
While I want to say I did not appreciate the violence of the original message I do agree with the sentiment. Let's not make it easy to siphon off ARIN resources.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Bill Darte
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9:35 AM
To: Jay Martin
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Subject: ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improved 8.4 Anti-Flip Language
I appreciate that you have a view to express that is opposed to the Draft Policy. I understand that you may even be upset about it and that you believe that the motivation is contrary to the community's interest. But I think that your personalized attack on the author is unwarranted and outside both the spirit of and stated Acceptable Use Policy for the PPML.
You may find the specific rules at https://www.arin.net/participate/mailing_lists/aup.html
ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Jay Martin <jaymartin926 at gmail.com<mailto:jaymartin926 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 21:17:58 +0000
From: David Huberman <David.Huberman at microsoft.com<mailto:David.Huberman at microsoft.com>>
To: Bill Darte <billdarte at gmail.com<mailto:billdarte at gmail.com>>, "arin-ppml at arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml at arin.net>"
<arin-ppml at arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml at arin.net>>, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com<mailto:owen at delong.com>>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN Draft Policy 2014-2 Improved 8.4
<87b03e32ad2743559958047e94c94044 at DM2PR03MB398.namprd03.prod.outlook.com<mailto:87b03e32ad2743559958047e94c94044 at DM2PR03MB398.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
As the author of this proposal, and having encountered the real-world consequences of existing 8.4 anti-flip language, I support #3 as the cleanest, simplest approach that best promotes Whois accuracy.
Can you specify what have you encountered in the real world ? which finally "inspire" you to write this proposal. I think your company is so selfish and what your cared is your own company. Keep buying ip and planning to transfer them into Asia Pacific region; meanwhile drain out of the IPs from the remained Arin pool.
ARIN is a registry, not a regulator. Let's write policy that promotes accuracy in Whois, please.
As a member of the community, i consider that you are a hypocrite. Your so-call caring about ARIN accuracy in whois is just an excuse for you to protect your company's benefit.
Let me expose what your intention behind this proposal, i think the community deserve the right to see your true face.
What you want to do is to help your own company to easily transfer either the purchased ip or the old allocated ip from Arin into the Asia Pacific region; meanwhile your company is able to keep squeezing and draining the remained free pool of Arin.
Your support of #3 will make it easy for your company to transfer ip into Asia Pacific, which will create a "the needs of Arin IP badly" image in the local ARIN region. Your purchased /13 from that bankruptcy is the justification of your company's needs in Arin region. Now you want a policy to help your company to transfer the "old" and " purchase" ip to Asia Pacific( you must be a good liar at making your justification to be approved by Arin), which will not affect your continuing application of big chunk block from Arin.
The system has already been established to take care of giant baby like your company and leave the smaller organisations without chance to have their deserved ip and suffer.
Wake up the community. Do you want this hypocrite to dry up the free pool?
I am against this proposal, it will only open the doors for some players to drain up the free pool of ARIN quickly.
David R Huberman
Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML