[arin-ppml] 2-byte and 4-byte ASNs
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Fri Apr 18 17:46:07 EDT 2014
Wouldn't these routing policies just need to be rewritten/modernized to
use extended communities instead of the old 32-bit communities? 64-bits
of ext-community ought to be enough for community-type, a 32-bit ASN, and
some policy instruction. Whether any routers support this, and in a
user-friendly display format, is the next question...and if not now, how
soon?
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Jason Schiller wrote:
> This was brought up at the open mic, and people just shrugged.
>
> I agree that this does not sound like a solution, but at the same
> time it did not move the community to reconsider their direction.
>> Question:
>>
>> Large ISPs implement BGP communities with a convention of 16-bit ASN
>> followed by 16-bits of locally defined meaning, such as set local pref
>> to 80.
>>
>> Does a comparable convention exist when dealing with 32-bit ASNs? If
>> not, what's the plan?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill Herrin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list