[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
jcurran at arin.net
Fri Mar 29 17:43:34 EDT 2013
On Mar 29, 2013, at 5:31 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> The idea is that an ISP receiving less than a /32 should *always* be
> able to expand to a /32 without either renumbering or adding a
> additional route to the public Internet. The loss of the balance of
> that /32 is far preferable to either the challenge of renumbering or
> the registry-driven addition of another BGP route.
That could be the case (if the community decides accordingly), and
it is simply important to make clear why the policy calls for more
significant reservations then might otherwise be expected.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML