[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs
bross at pobox.com
Fri Mar 29 11:37:34 EDT 2013
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, David Farmer wrote:
> I'd change that a little and add another subsection;
> 184.108.40.206(g): An LIR that requested a /36 or /40 initial allocation is
> entitled to increase said allocation's size to /36 or /32. This change is
> not a subsequent allocation as described in 6.5.3. Additionally, a minimum
> of a /32 will be reserved for all such LIRs to facilitate this expansion.
I'm good with that.
> 220.127.116.11(h): An LIR that received a /32 initial allocation before the
> availability of the /36 and /40 initial allocation sizes is entitled to a
> one-time decrease of their allocation size to /36 or /40. Such an LIR will
> retain the first (lowest numbered) subnet or the last (highest numbered)
> subnet of their original block.
What benefit does it give the community to limit reduction in allocation
size to only those that were issued earlier and only once? I am against
that change as plenty of organizations may make initial errors in their
allocation requests and might want to move back to a smaller size later.
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
More information about the ARIN-PPML