[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Thu Mar 28 22:41:04 EDT 2013

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, George Herbert wrote:
>  I think that the remaining question is whether there's any need for
>> the policy proposal with the fixed table.
> Absolutely there is a need for the policy.  The minimum allocation needs
> to be lowered to the smallest IPv6 block in the table (/40).  Plus an ISP
> that has already gotten a /32 needs to be allowed to return enough to fit
> into a /40.

Reply # 2 on this but...

The CORRECTED TABLE that John put out - apparently ARIN made a goof
somewhere - had a /40 for XX-small.

It's upthread.

With that correction, is there any need for a policy change?

-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20130328/fb854018/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list