[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

Rob Seastrom ppml at rs.seastrom.com
Thu Mar 28 08:44:19 EDT 2013

Brandon Ross <bross at pobox.com> writes:

> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, John Curran wrote:
>>  I believe that the "/48 or smaller" line on the pending fee
>>  schedule is incorrect and in the process of being fixed.
> Now that makes all the difference in the world if that were to happen.
>>  The correct number in the series should read "/40 or less"
>>  Once corrected, your ISP colleagues who are in the xx-small
>>  category (with a /22 of IPv4 or less) can would be able to
>>  obtain a corresponding /40 of IPv6 (if the policy proposal
>>  being discussed were adopted) and there would be no charge.
> I very much agree and would be very happy to see that happen.  If it
> does, I would support a change to the policy proposal to move the
> minimum allocation to /40.

+1 - I applaud the changes to make number resources less expensive at
the small ISP end, but will be even happier when the upcoming
"discount for not implementing IPv6" situation is fixed.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list